What are the limitations of Linear Programming in Industrial Engineering, and how can they be addressed?
This question has been flagged
Linear Programming (LP) in industrial engineering has limitations, such as the assumption of linearity, determinism, and single objectives, which do not always reflect real-world complexities. It struggles with nonlinear relationships, uncertain data, and multiple conflicting goals. LP also faces scalability issues in large problems, cannot handle integer-only solutions, and lacks flexibility in dynamic environments and qualitative factors. These challenges can be addressed by using advanced techniques like Nonlinear and Stochastic Programming, Multi-Objective Optimization, Integer Programming, and Dynamic Programming, along with heuristic methods and qualitative decision-making frameworks to enhance its applicability.
The assumption of linearity in relationships, which may not adequately represent the intricacies of the real world, and the need for deterministic data, which ignores uncertainty or variability in parameters, are two of the drawbacks of linear programming in industrial engineering. Furthermore, with a lot of variables and constraints, LP models can become unduly complicated and challenging to solve. Using stochastic programming to account for uncertainty, non-linear programming techniques for more complex relationships, and heuristic or meta heuristics algorithms for large-scale problems to find near-optimal solutions more efficiently can all help overcome these limitations. LP can continue to be a useful instrument for industrial process optimization by acknowledging and adjusting to these difficulties.